Home » Game News » The game Holyrood voting system is too risky

The game Holyrood voting system is too risky

When proposing a "solution," it is always a good idea to make sure that you know the problem you are actually solving. Therefore, when Ruth Wishart suggested independent supporters to make a strategic shift on the Holyrood area list vote and began voting for untested and untested [currently very small] political parties, we This should be done in the hope of the party’s quirks. The voting system will provide more pro-printed MSPs. The first question to ask is why this goal is so important.

Is it because if we do not try a new bold attempt, we will not win the pro-Indian majority of the Scottish Parliament? Well, no, this is not possible, because the last two elections have produced a decisive majority for "yes" political parties, and the 2011 election even produced a single-party SNP majority. All recent polls indicate that SNP is working hard to regain the majority of votes. Okay, polls may be inaccurate, in any case they are just snapshots of views-however, if a serious error occurs on the polling day, it will first translate into a serious loss of voter seats, which the SNP needs to make up if they want To continue to serve as a minority government, it will be at the top of the list. If some of their most enthusiastic supporters did not even vote for them on the list, then they would obviously be unlikely to do so.

Or is the voting system biased towards independent parties to some extent, and we need to think outside the box to ensure fair representation, is this a problem? No, it’s not because 53% of the MSPs are in favor of printing based on 47% of the constituency votes and 49% of the regional ballots. As long as the SNP maintains its dominant position, even in the case of proportional representation, the "yes" forces may be slightly overrepresented.

All of this led me to conclude that the game system is actually what we don't need to do, and we are only chasing a few extra reward seats. Although these seats are very good, they can't really realize the difference in reasons. In this case, it is essential to ensure that the risks involved do not exceed the relatively modest potential returns. If we put the entire pre-print manufacturer in danger in pursuit of cute bonuses, that is not a reasonable thing. In fact, I can even say that it only makes sense to try any method if there is no risk at all.

This is clearly not the case. The Independent Party currently has 10 seats [SNP has 4 seats and Greens has 6 seats]. Without these MSPs, there would be no majority in favor. Some people may naively believe that joining the new "yes" party on the list will not put these seats in danger, because as the seats of the SNP and the Greens decrease, the new party will win the seats. But it is actually impossible to work this way, because even if a seat is to be won, a political party needs to obtain at least 5% or 6% of the votes in the electoral area. It is very unusual for marginal parties to achieve this goal-the only time in Scottish Parliament history was in 2003, when the Scottish Senior Citizens’ Unity Party unexpectedly won a seat. But even this feat can only be achieved by striking stunts that attract old company legends Billy McNeill and Eric Caldow as paper candidates [ie, they both rank far below them, so they have no chance of being elected].

Supporters of the game system often speak, just as pro-Indian voters are chess pieces, you can achieve the desired results by randomly moving hundreds of thousands of votes from one party to another. As Tommy Cooper said in the past. Real people are not so easy to be grazed. To achieve the scale of tactical transformation needed to eliminate any risk, you need one of two things-mind control rays, or someone with a huge personal follower can lead the new party and bring a small amount Ballots. Literally, the only politician I can think of is Alex Salmond. If it is assumed that he wants to join a new party, or if he wants to form his own party, the equation will change.

However, if Mr. Salmond is more likely not to do so, any so-called "tactical ballots on the tactical list" will effectively disappear into a black hole, and the Union Party will be a grateful beneficiary.

This article is part of the new digital-only part of the website we are trying, and we will bring you the best writers' reactions, analysis and insights in real time without you waiting for the newspaper to print. Please send any feedback to callum.baird@thenational.scot!

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *